New Zealand vs Panama: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- New Zealand
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 1,103 t against 758.99 t in New Zealand, a difference of 344.01 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.5 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 92nd and Panama ranks 90th of 165 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,832 t | 69.82 t | 4,763 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 1,408 t | 1,373 t | 34.93 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 1,371 t | 894.84 t | 476.55 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, New Zealand or Panama?
- Panama, at 1,103 t against 758.99 t in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between New Zealand and Panama?
- 344.01 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Panama?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Panama rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- New Zealand ranks 92nd and Panama ranks 90th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf