Panama vs Switzerland: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Panama
- Switzerland
How they compare
Panama currently reports 1,103 t against 756.09 t in Switzerland, a difference of 346.91 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.5 times Switzerland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Switzerland ahead.
Panama ranks 90th and Switzerland ranks 93rd of 165 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.82 t | 674.12 t | 604.3 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 1,373 t | 1,745 t | 372.16 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 894.84 t | 1,785 t | 890.38 t | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Panama or Switzerland?
- Panama, at 1,103 t against 756.09 t in Switzerland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Panama and Switzerland?
- 346.91 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Switzerland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Panama and Switzerland rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Panama ranks 90th and Switzerland ranks 93rd of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf