Slovenia vs Zambia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Slovenia
- Zambia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 65,719 t against 49,049 t in Zambia, a difference of 16,670 t.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.3 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Zambia ahead.
Slovenia ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 24th of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 584.92 t | 1,918 t | 1,333 t | Zambia |
| 2010s | 500.63 t | 36,341 t | 35,841 t | Zambia |
| 2020s | 29,073 t | 28,899 t | 174.7 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Slovenia or Zambia?
- Slovenia, at 65,719 t against 49,049 t in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Slovenia and Zambia?
- 16,670 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Zambia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Slovenia and Zambia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Slovenia ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 24th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf