Sudan vs Turkmenistan: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity

Sudan
37.01 t
in 2018
Turkmenistan
26.1 t
in 2024
Sudan rank
125th
Turkmenistan rank
127th

Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time

  • Sudan
  • Turkmenistan
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k201220182024

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 37.01 t against 26.1 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 10.91 t.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.4 times Turkmenistan's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Sudan ranks 125th and Turkmenistan ranks 127th of 165 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Sudan or Turkmenistan?
Sudan, at 37.01 t against 26.1 t in Turkmenistan as of 2018.
What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Sudan and Turkmenistan?
10.91 t, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Turkmenistan?
5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
How do Sudan and Turkmenistan rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
Sudan ranks 125th and Turkmenistan ranks 127th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
196 places, 3,774 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf