Albania vs Eswatini: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Albania
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 216.41 1000 USD against 124.21 1000 USD in Albania, a difference of 92.2 1000 USD.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.7 times Albania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Eswatini ahead.
Albania ranks 109th and Eswatini ranks 107th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.26 1000 USD | 152.2 1000 USD | 133.95 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 63.32 1000 USD | 34.33 1000 USD | 29 1000 USD | Albania |
| 2020s | 124.21 1000 USD | 68.47 1000 USD | 55.74 1000 USD | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Albania or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 216.41 1000 USD against 124.21 1000 USD in Albania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Albania and Eswatini?
- 92.2 1000 USD, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Eswatini?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
- How do Albania and Eswatini rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Albania ranks 109th and Eswatini ranks 107th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf