Angola vs Uzbekistan: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Angola
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Angola currently reports 5,562 1000 USD against 5,403 1000 USD in Uzbekistan, a difference of 159 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 60th and Uzbekistan ranks 61st of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.81 1000 USD | 63.62 1000 USD | 21.19 1000 USD | Angola |
| 2010s | 566.26 1000 USD | 763.42 1000 USD | 197.15 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 2,172 1000 USD | 9,387 1000 USD | 7,216 1000 USD | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Angola or Uzbekistan?
- Angola, at 5,562 1000 USD against 5,403 1000 USD in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Angola and Uzbekistan?
- 159 1000 USD, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Uzbekistan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Uzbekistan rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Angola ranks 60th and Uzbekistan ranks 61st of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf