Armenia vs Jamaica: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Armenia
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 288.1 1000 USD against 286.68 1000 USD in Armenia, a difference of 1.42 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 104th and Jamaica ranks 103rd of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Jamaica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 684.19 1000 USD | 0.93 1000 USD | 683.26 1000 USD | Armenia |
| 2010s | 56.18 1000 USD | 17.63 1000 USD | 38.55 1000 USD | Armenia |
| 2020s | 433.67 1000 USD | 515.36 1000 USD | 81.69 1000 USD | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Armenia or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 288.1 1000 USD against 286.68 1000 USD in Armenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Armenia and Jamaica?
- 1.42 1000 USD, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Jamaica?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Jamaica rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Armenia ranks 104th and Jamaica ranks 103rd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf