Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Viet Nam: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
924,793 1000 USD
in 2024
Viet Nam
25,350 1000 USD
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) rank
3rd
Viet Nam rank
3rd

Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time

  • Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
  • Viet Nam
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M200220132024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) currently reports 924,793 1000 USD against 25,350 1000 USD in Viet Nam, a difference of 899,443 1000 USD.

That makes Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)'s figure about 36.5 times Viet Nam's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ranks 3rd and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 153 countries.

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) Viet Nam Difference Ahead
2000s 226,234 1000 USD 13,918 1000 USD 212,316 1000 USD Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
2010s 363,199 1000 USD 23,133 1000 USD 340,065 1000 USD Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
2020s 647,904 1000 USD 19,014 1000 USD 628,890 1000 USD Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) or Viet Nam?
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade), at 924,793 1000 USD against 25,350 1000 USD in Viet Nam as of 2024.
What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Viet Nam?
899,443 1000 USD, with Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Viet Nam?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Viet Nam rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ranks 3rd and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Viet Nam: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/monoammonium-phosphate-map-import-value/australia-and-new-zealand-excluding-intra-trade/viet-nam-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/monoammonium-phosphate-map-import-value/australia-and-new-zealand-excluding-intra-trade/viet-nam-2/">Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Viet Nam: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
195 places, 3,768 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf