Bangladesh vs Sweden: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Bangladesh
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 8,877 1000 USD against 8,691 1000 USD in Bangladesh, a difference of 186 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 50th and Sweden ranks 49th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 392.33 1000 USD | 3,011 1000 USD | 2,619 1000 USD | Sweden |
| 2010s | 4,996 1000 USD | 4,727 1000 USD | 269.1 1000 USD | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 10,815 1000 USD | 9,071 1000 USD | 1,744 1000 USD | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Bangladesh or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 8,877 1000 USD against 8,691 1000 USD in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Bangladesh and Sweden?
- 186 1000 USD, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sweden?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Sweden rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Bangladesh ranks 50th and Sweden ranks 49th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf