Barbados vs Iceland: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Barbados
- Iceland
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 15.32 1000 USD against 14.91 1000 USD in Iceland, a difference of 0.41 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iceland ahead.
Barbados ranks 134th and Iceland ranks 135th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 246.86 1000 USD | 539.02 1000 USD | 292.16 1000 USD | Iceland |
| 2010s | 253.04 1000 USD | 25.51 1000 USD | 227.53 1000 USD | Barbados |
| 2020s | 63.34 1000 USD | 53.27 1000 USD | 10.07 1000 USD | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Barbados or Iceland?
- Barbados, at 15.32 1000 USD against 14.91 1000 USD in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Barbados and Iceland?
- 0.41 1000 USD, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Iceland?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
- How do Barbados and Iceland rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Barbados ranks 134th and Iceland ranks 135th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf