Belgium vs Czechia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Belgium
- Czechia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 24,885 1000 USD against 24,761 1000 USD in Czechia, a difference of 124 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Czechia ahead.
Belgium ranks 33rd and Czechia ranks 34th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Czechia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17,318 1000 USD | 20,940 1000 USD | 3,623 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2010s | 25,152 1000 USD | 19,658 1000 USD | 5,494 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 15,967 1000 USD | 18,076 1000 USD | 2,109 1000 USD | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Belgium or Czechia?
- Belgium, at 24,885 1000 USD against 24,761 1000 USD in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Belgium and Czechia?
- 124 1000 USD, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Czechia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Czechia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Belgium ranks 33rd and Czechia ranks 34th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf