Botswana vs Seychelles: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Botswana
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 8.16 1000 USD against 7.54 1000 USD in Botswana, a difference of 0.62 1000 USD.
That makes Seychelles's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 138th and Seychelles ranks 137th of 164 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.62 1000 USD | 3.53 1000 USD | 3.09 1000 USD | Botswana |
| 2020s | 21.84 1000 USD | 5.86 1000 USD | 15.98 1000 USD | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Botswana or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 8.16 1000 USD against 7.54 1000 USD in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Botswana and Seychelles?
- 0.62 1000 USD, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Seychelles?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Botswana and Seychelles rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Botswana ranks 138th and Seychelles ranks 137th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf