Bulgaria vs Ecuador: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Bulgaria
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 17,659 1000 USD against 16,823 1000 USD in Bulgaria, a difference of 836 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 40th and Ecuador ranks 39th of 153 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,667 1000 USD | 1,917 1000 USD | 249.99 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 17,198 1000 USD | 6,876 1000 USD | 10,322 1000 USD | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 12,359 1000 USD | 10,788 1000 USD | 1,571 1000 USD | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Bulgaria or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 17,659 1000 USD against 16,823 1000 USD in Bulgaria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Bulgaria and Ecuador?
- 836 1000 USD, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Ecuador?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bulgaria and Ecuador rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Bulgaria ranks 40th and Ecuador ranks 39th of 153 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf