Burundi vs Kyrgyzstan: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Burundi
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 0.58 1000 USD against 0.31 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.27 1000 USD.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.9 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 150th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 152nd of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 431.45 1000 USD | 184.22 1000 USD | 247.24 1000 USD | Burundi |
| 2020s | 6.16 1000 USD | 905.26 1000 USD | 899.1 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Burundi or Kyrgyzstan?
- Burundi, at 0.58 1000 USD against 0.31 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Burundi and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.27 1000 USD, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Burundi and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Burundi ranks 150th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 152nd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf