Burundi vs New Caledonia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Burundi
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0.71 1000 USD against 0.58 1000 USD in Burundi, a difference of 0.13 1000 USD.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Burundi's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 150th and New Caledonia ranks 149th of 164 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 106.41 1000 USD | 0.22 1000 USD | 106.19 1000 USD | Burundi |
| 2010s | 487.11 1000 USD | 1.24 1000 USD | 485.87 1000 USD | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Burundi or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 0.71 1000 USD against 0.58 1000 USD in Burundi as of 2014.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Burundi and New Caledonia?
- 0.13 1000 USD, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and New Caledonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Burundi and New Caledonia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Burundi ranks 150th and New Caledonia ranks 149th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf