Cameroon vs Cuba: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Cameroon
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.26 1000 USD against 0.2 1000 USD in Cameroon, a difference of 0.06 1000 USD.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.3 times Cameroon's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Cuba ahead.
Cameroon ranks 156th and Cuba ranks 153rd of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 2 and Cuba in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 860.9 1000 USD | 276.13 1000 USD | 584.77 1000 USD | Cameroon |
| 2010s | 683.01 1000 USD | 247.44 1000 USD | 435.57 1000 USD | Cameroon |
| 2020s | 0.07 1000 USD | 380.36 1000 USD | 380.29 1000 USD | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Cameroon or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 0.26 1000 USD against 0.2 1000 USD in Cameroon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Cameroon and Cuba?
- 0.06 1000 USD, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Cuba?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
- How do Cameroon and Cuba rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Cameroon ranks 156th and Cuba ranks 153rd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf