Chile vs Spain: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Chile
- Spain
How they compare
Chile currently reports 116,553 1000 USD against 89,101 1000 USD in Spain, a difference of 27,452 1000 USD.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Spain's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 8th and Spain ranks 10th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Spain in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34,466 1000 USD | 27,004 1000 USD | 7,462 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2010s | 53,153 1000 USD | 56,838 1000 USD | 3,685 1000 USD | Spain |
| 2020s | 94,136 1000 USD | 83,018 1000 USD | 11,118 1000 USD | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Chile or Spain?
- Chile, at 116,553 1000 USD against 89,101 1000 USD in Spain as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Chile and Spain?
- 27,452 1000 USD, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Spain?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Spain rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Chile ranks 8th and Spain ranks 10th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf