Congo vs Russian Federation: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Congo
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Congo currently reports 101.49 1000 USD against 61.76 1000 USD in Russian Federation, a difference of 39.73 1000 USD.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.6 times Russian Federation's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 115th and Russian Federation ranks 118th of 164 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.67 1000 USD | 1,511 1000 USD | 1,502 1000 USD | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 56.52 1000 USD | 744.75 1000 USD | 688.23 1000 USD | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Congo or Russian Federation?
- Congo, at 101.49 1000 USD against 61.76 1000 USD in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Congo and Russian Federation?
- 39.73 1000 USD, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Russian Federation?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Russian Federation rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Congo ranks 115th and Russian Federation ranks 118th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf