Cuba vs Equatorial Guinea: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Cuba
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.26 1000 USD against 0.26 1000 USD in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 153rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 153rd of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 104.78 1000 USD | 116.78 1000 USD | 12 1000 USD | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 55.94 1000 USD | 2.62 1000 USD | 53.31 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.26 1000 USD | 0.26 1000 USD | 0 1000 USD | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Cuba or Equatorial Guinea?
- Cuba, at 0.26 1000 USD against 0.26 1000 USD in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Cuba and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0 1000 USD, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Equatorial Guinea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Cuba ranks 153rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 153rd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf