Cuba vs Malta: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Cuba
- Malta
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.26 1000 USD against 0.22 1000 USD in Malta, a difference of 0.04 1000 USD.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 142nd and Malta ranks 144th of 153 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 195.9 1000 USD | 10.64 1000 USD | 185.25 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2010s | 246.94 1000 USD | 7.04 1000 USD | 239.9 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2020s | 190.31 1000 USD | 2.97 1000 USD | 187.34 1000 USD | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Cuba or Malta?
- Cuba, at 0.26 1000 USD against 0.22 1000 USD in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Cuba and Malta?
- 0.04 1000 USD, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malta?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Malta rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Cuba ranks 142nd and Malta ranks 144th of 153 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf