Cyprus vs Guinea: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Cyprus
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 5.3 1000 USD against 5.01 1000 USD in Cyprus, a difference of 0.29 1000 USD.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Cyprus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guinea ahead.
Cyprus ranks 141st and Guinea ranks 140th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 2 and Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.24 1000 USD | 36.94 1000 USD | 3.7 1000 USD | Guinea |
| 2010s | 143.25 1000 USD | 1.38 1000 USD | 141.87 1000 USD | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 34.07 1000 USD | 2.92 1000 USD | 31.15 1000 USD | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Cyprus or Guinea?
- Guinea, at 5.3 1000 USD against 5.01 1000 USD in Cyprus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Cyprus and Guinea?
- 0.29 1000 USD, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Guinea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Guinea rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Cyprus ranks 141st and Guinea ranks 140th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf