Cyprus vs Guyana: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Cyprus
- Guyana
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 5.01 1000 USD against 2.62 1000 USD in Guyana, a difference of 2.39 1000 USD.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.9 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 141st and Guyana ranks 143rd of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Guyana in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.06 1000 USD | 78.11 1000 USD | 62.04 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2010s | 83.04 1000 USD | 31.02 1000 USD | 52.02 1000 USD | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 23.81 1000 USD | 124.12 1000 USD | 100.31 1000 USD | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Cyprus or Guyana?
- Cyprus, at 5.01 1000 USD against 2.62 1000 USD in Guyana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Cyprus and Guyana?
- 2.39 1000 USD, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Guyana?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Guyana rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Cyprus ranks 141st and Guyana ranks 143rd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf