Czechia vs Viet Nam: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Czechia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 25,350 1000 USD against 24,761 1000 USD in Czechia, a difference of 589 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 34th and Viet Nam ranks 32nd of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20,940 1000 USD | 13,918 1000 USD | 7,022 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2010s | 19,658 1000 USD | 23,133 1000 USD | 3,476 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 16,404 1000 USD | 19,014 1000 USD | 2,610 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Czechia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 25,350 1000 USD against 24,761 1000 USD in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Czechia and Viet Nam?
- 589 1000 USD, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Viet Nam?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Viet Nam rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Czechia ranks 34th and Viet Nam ranks 32nd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf