Egypt vs Slovakia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Egypt
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 7,342 1000 USD against 7,047 1000 USD in Egypt, a difference of 295 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Slovakia ahead.
Egypt ranks 56th and Slovakia ranks 54th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 751.88 1000 USD | 14,321 1000 USD | 13,569 1000 USD | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 4,718 1000 USD | 11,867 1000 USD | 7,150 1000 USD | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 10,625 1000 USD | 6,513 1000 USD | 4,111 1000 USD | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Egypt or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 7,342 1000 USD against 7,047 1000 USD in Egypt as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Egypt and Slovakia?
- 295 1000 USD, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Slovakia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Slovakia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Egypt ranks 56th and Slovakia ranks 54th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf