Fiji vs Finland: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Fiji
- Finland
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 810.06 1000 USD against 725.68 1000 USD in Finland, a difference of 84.38 1000 USD.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 87th and Finland ranks 90th of 164 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 435.73 1000 USD | 1,434 1000 USD | 998.56 1000 USD | Finland |
| 2010s | 641.36 1000 USD | 2,359 1000 USD | 1,718 1000 USD | Finland |
| 2020s | 406.58 1000 USD | 3,219 1000 USD | 2,813 1000 USD | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Fiji or Finland?
- Fiji, at 810.06 1000 USD against 725.68 1000 USD in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Fiji and Finland?
- 84.38 1000 USD, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Finland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Finland rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Fiji ranks 87th and Finland ranks 90th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf