Georgia vs Honduras: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Georgia
- Honduras
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 1,905 1000 USD against 1,890 1000 USD in Honduras, a difference of 15 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Honduras ahead.
Georgia ranks 74th and Honduras ranks 75th of 164 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 174.04 1000 USD | 675.72 1000 USD | 501.68 1000 USD | Honduras |
| 2010s | 579.25 1000 USD | 3,760 1000 USD | 3,180 1000 USD | Honduras |
| 2020s | 2,830 1000 USD | 2,993 1000 USD | 163.08 1000 USD | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Georgia or Honduras?
- Georgia, at 1,905 1000 USD against 1,890 1000 USD in Honduras as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Georgia and Honduras?
- 15 1000 USD, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Honduras?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Honduras rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Georgia ranks 74th and Honduras ranks 75th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf