Ghana vs Jamaica: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) β Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) β Import value over time
- Ghana
- Jamaica
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 349.48 1000 USD against 288.1 1000 USD in Jamaica, a difference of 61.38 1000 USD.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.2 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 100th and Jamaica ranks 103rd of 164 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 333.6 1000 USD | 7.56 1000 USD | 326.04 1000 USD | Ghana |
| 2010s | 772.46 1000 USD | 16.19 1000 USD | 756.28 1000 USD | Ghana |
| 2020s | 5,823 1000 USD | 744.47 1000 USD | 5,078 1000 USD | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) β import value, Ghana or Jamaica?
- Ghana, at 349.48 1000 USD against 288.1 1000 USD in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) β import value between Ghana and Jamaica?
- 61.38 1000 USD, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Jamaica?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Ghana and Jamaica rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) β import value?
- Ghana ranks 100th and Jamaica ranks 103rd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) β Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf