Greece vs Latvia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Greece
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 21,119 1000 USD against 19,449 1000 USD in Greece, a difference of 1,670 1000 USD.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Greece's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 40th and Latvia ranks 39th of 164 countries.
Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,353 1000 USD | 1,770 1000 USD | 4,583 1000 USD | Greece |
| 2010s | 10,110 1000 USD | 6,277 1000 USD | 3,833 1000 USD | Greece |
| 2020s | 18,524 1000 USD | 12,414 1000 USD | 6,110 1000 USD | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Greece or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 21,119 1000 USD against 19,449 1000 USD in Greece as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Greece and Latvia?
- 1,670 1000 USD, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Latvia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Greece and Latvia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Greece ranks 40th and Latvia ranks 39th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf