Guatemala vs Ireland: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Guatemala
- Ireland
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 3,128 1000 USD against 3,058 1000 USD in Ireland, a difference of 70 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 67th and Ireland ranks 68th of 164 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,491 1000 USD | 3,104 1000 USD | 2,388 1000 USD | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 7,391 1000 USD | 155.4 1000 USD | 7,235 1000 USD | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 5,624 1000 USD | 740.94 1000 USD | 4,883 1000 USD | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Guatemala or Ireland?
- Guatemala, at 3,128 1000 USD against 3,058 1000 USD in Ireland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Guatemala and Ireland?
- 70 1000 USD, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Ireland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Ireland rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Guatemala ranks 67th and Ireland ranks 68th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf