Japan vs Mexico: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Japan
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 78,719 1000 USD against 61,096 1000 USD in Japan, a difference of 17,623 1000 USD.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.3 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 15th and Mexico ranks 13th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64,454 1000 USD | 67,753 1000 USD | 3,299 1000 USD | Mexico |
| 2010s | 62,852 1000 USD | 59,842 1000 USD | 3,010 1000 USD | Japan |
| 2020s | 74,019 1000 USD | 97,587 1000 USD | 23,568 1000 USD | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Japan or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 78,719 1000 USD against 61,096 1000 USD in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Japan and Mexico?
- 17,623 1000 USD, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mexico?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Mexico rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Japan ranks 15th and Mexico ranks 13th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf