Japan vs Zimbabwe: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Japan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Japan currently reports 61,096 1000 USD against 59,833 1000 USD in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,263 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 164 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64,454 1000 USD | 1,532 1000 USD | 62,921 1000 USD | Japan |
| 2010s | 62,852 1000 USD | 24,566 1000 USD | 38,286 1000 USD | Japan |
| 2020s | 77,250 1000 USD | 74,710 1000 USD | 2,539 1000 USD | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Japan or Zimbabwe?
- Japan, at 61,096 1000 USD against 59,833 1000 USD in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Japan and Zimbabwe?
- 1,263 1000 USD, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Zimbabwe rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Japan ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf