Latvia vs Serbia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Latvia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 22,894 1000 USD against 21,119 1000 USD in Latvia, a difference of 1,775 1000 USD.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Latvia ranks 36th and Serbia ranks 33rd of 153 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,842 1000 USD | 31,357 1000 USD | 29,515 1000 USD | Serbia |
| 2010s | 6,277 1000 USD | 28,197 1000 USD | 21,920 1000 USD | Serbia |
| 2020s | 12,414 1000 USD | 16,518 1000 USD | 4,104 1000 USD | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Latvia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 22,894 1000 USD against 21,119 1000 USD in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Latvia and Serbia?
- 1,775 1000 USD, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Serbia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Latvia ranks 36th and Serbia ranks 33rd of 153 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf