Lithuania vs Serbia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Lithuania
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 22,894 1000 USD against 22,878 1000 USD in Lithuania, a difference of 16 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Lithuania ranks 36th and Serbia ranks 35th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,278 1000 USD | 31,357 1000 USD | 25,079 1000 USD | Serbia |
| 2010s | 9,905 1000 USD | 28,197 1000 USD | 18,292 1000 USD | Serbia |
| 2020s | 19,726 1000 USD | 16,518 1000 USD | 3,208 1000 USD | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Lithuania or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 22,894 1000 USD against 22,878 1000 USD in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Lithuania and Serbia?
- 16 1000 USD, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Serbia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Lithuania ranks 36th and Serbia ranks 35th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf