Mali vs Turkmenistan: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Mali
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Mali currently reports 39.38 1000 USD against 36.68 1000 USD in Turkmenistan, a difference of 2.7 1000 USD.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 125th and Turkmenistan ranks 127th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 39,162 1000 USD | 3,045 1000 USD | 36,117 1000 USD | Mali |
| 2020s | 25.11 1000 USD | 3,903 1000 USD | 3,878 1000 USD | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Mali or Turkmenistan?
- Mali, at 39.38 1000 USD against 36.68 1000 USD in Turkmenistan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Mali and Turkmenistan?
- 2.7 1000 USD, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Turkmenistan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
- How do Mali and Turkmenistan rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Mali ranks 125th and Turkmenistan ranks 127th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf