Mongolia vs Qatar: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Mongolia
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 51.86 1000 USD against 40.95 1000 USD in Mongolia, a difference of 10.91 1000 USD.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.3 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Qatar ahead.
Mongolia ranks 115th and Qatar ranks 112th of 153 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 63.27 1000 USD | 15.64 1000 USD | 47.63 1000 USD | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 60.42 1000 USD | 129.2 1000 USD | 68.78 1000 USD | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Mongolia or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 51.86 1000 USD against 40.95 1000 USD in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Mongolia and Qatar?
- 10.91 1000 USD, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Qatar?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Qatar rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Mongolia ranks 115th and Qatar ranks 112th of 153 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf