Mongolia vs Sri Lanka: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Mongolia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 48.45 1000 USD against 40.95 1000 USD in Mongolia, a difference of 7.5 1000 USD.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Mongolia ranks 124th and Sri Lanka ranks 122nd of 164 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 132.49 1000 USD | 312.25 1000 USD | 179.76 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 60.42 1000 USD | 147.14 1000 USD | 86.72 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Mongolia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 48.45 1000 USD against 40.95 1000 USD in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Mongolia and Sri Lanka?
- 7.5 1000 USD, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Sri Lanka?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Sri Lanka rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Mongolia ranks 124th and Sri Lanka ranks 122nd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf