Mongolia vs Sudan: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value

Mongolia
40.95 1000 USD
in 2023
Sudan
49.06 1000 USD
in 2018
Mongolia rank
124th
Sudan rank
121st

Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time

  • Mongolia
  • Sudan
0200400600800201020162023

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 49.06 1000 USD against 40.95 1000 USD in Mongolia, a difference of 8.11 1000 USD.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Sudan ahead.

Mongolia ranks 124th and Sudan ranks 121st of 164 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Mongolia or Sudan?
Sudan, at 49.06 1000 USD against 40.95 1000 USD in Mongolia as of 2018.
What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Mongolia and Sudan?
8.11 1000 USD, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Sudan?
6 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2018.
How do Mongolia and Sudan rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
Mongolia ranks 124th and Sudan ranks 121st of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
195 places, 3,768 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf