Myanmar vs Pakistan: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Myanmar
- Pakistan
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 7,051 1000 USD against 6,759 1000 USD in Pakistan, a difference of 292 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Pakistan ahead.
Myanmar ranks 55th and Pakistan ranks 57th of 164 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.02 1000 USD | 143,930 1000 USD | 143,844 1000 USD | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 564.09 1000 USD | 9,001 1000 USD | 8,437 1000 USD | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 2,072 1000 USD | 9,362 1000 USD | 7,290 1000 USD | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Myanmar or Pakistan?
- Myanmar, at 7,051 1000 USD against 6,759 1000 USD in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Myanmar and Pakistan?
- 292 1000 USD, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Pakistan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Myanmar and Pakistan rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Myanmar ranks 55th and Pakistan ranks 57th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf