Nigeria vs Sudan: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) β€” Import value

Nigeria
55.91 1000 USD
in 2024
Sudan
49.06 1000 USD
in 2018
Nigeria rank
119th
Sudan rank
121st

Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) β€” Import value over time

  • Nigeria
  • Sudan
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k200220132024

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 55.91 1000 USD against 49.06 1000 USD in Sudan, a difference of 6.85 1000 USD.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Nigeria ahead.

Nigeria ranks 119th and Sudan ranks 121st of 164 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) β€” import value, Nigeria or Sudan?
Nigeria, at 55.91 1000 USD against 49.06 1000 USD in Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) β€” import value between Nigeria and Sudan?
6.85 1000 USD, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Sudan?
7 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
How do Nigeria and Sudan rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) β€” import value?
Nigeria ranks 119th and Sudan ranks 121st of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) β€” Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) β€” Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
195 places, 3,768 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf