Poland vs Zambia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Poland
- Zambia
How they compare
Poland currently reports 59,196 1000 USD against 41,634 1000 USD in Zambia, a difference of 17,562 1000 USD.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.4 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 18th and Zambia ranks 21st of 164 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,222 1000 USD | 1,111 1000 USD | 8,111 1000 USD | Poland |
| 2010s | 35,301 1000 USD | 21,509 1000 USD | 13,791 1000 USD | Poland |
| 2020s | 29,926 1000 USD | 22,926 1000 USD | 7,001 1000 USD | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Poland or Zambia?
- Poland, at 59,196 1000 USD against 41,634 1000 USD in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Poland and Zambia?
- 17,562 1000 USD, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Zambia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Zambia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Poland ranks 18th and Zambia ranks 21st of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf