Poland vs Zimbabwe: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Poland
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 59,833 1000 USD against 59,196 1000 USD in Poland, a difference of 637 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,222 1000 USD | 1,532 1000 USD | 7,689 1000 USD | Poland |
| 2010s | 35,301 1000 USD | 24,566 1000 USD | 10,735 1000 USD | Poland |
| 2020s | 29,926 1000 USD | 74,710 1000 USD | 44,784 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Poland or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 59,833 1000 USD against 59,196 1000 USD in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Poland and Zimbabwe?
- 637 1000 USD, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Zimbabwe rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Poland ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf