Uruguay vs Zambia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value over time
- Uruguay
- Zambia
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 48,359 1000 USD against 41,634 1000 USD in Zambia, a difference of 6,725 1000 USD.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Uruguay ranks 20th and Zambia ranks 21st of 164 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uruguay | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27,461 1000 USD | 1,111 1000 USD | 26,350 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 48,725 1000 USD | 21,509 1000 USD | 27,215 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 55,899 1000 USD | 22,926 1000 USD | 32,973 1000 USD | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value, Uruguay or Zambia?
- Uruguay, at 48,359 1000 USD against 41,634 1000 USD in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value between Uruguay and Zambia?
- 6,725 1000 USD, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Zambia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Uruguay and Zambia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import value?
- Uruguay ranks 20th and Zambia ranks 21st of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf