Iceland vs Malawi: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Production

Iceland
0 t
in 2023
Malawi
1,324 t
in 2024
Iceland rank
13th
Malawi rank
12th

Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Production over time

  • Iceland
  • Malawi
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k200920162024

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 1,324 t against 0 t in Iceland, a difference of 1,324 t.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 13th and Malawi ranks 12th of 46 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Malawi Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 0 t 9,153 t 9,153 t Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — production, Iceland or Malawi?
Malawi, at 1,324 t against 0 t in Iceland as of 2024.
What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — production between Iceland and Malawi?
1,324 t, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malawi?
11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Malawi rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — production?
Iceland ranks 13th and Malawi ranks 12th of 46 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
47 places, 478 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf