Luxembourg vs Seychelles: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Production

Luxembourg
0 t
in 2024
Seychelles
0 t
in 2014
Luxembourg rank
13th
Seychelles rank
13th

Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Production over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Seychelles
00.20.40.60.81200620152024

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Seychelles, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Seychelles has been ahead every year.

Luxembourg ranks 13th and Seychelles ranks 13th of 46 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Seychelles Difference Ahead
2000s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — production, Luxembourg or Seychelles?
Luxembourg, at 0 t against 0 t in Seychelles as of 2024.
What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — production between Luxembourg and Seychelles?
0 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Seychelles?
6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
How do Luxembourg and Seychelles rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — production?
Luxembourg ranks 13th and Seychelles ranks 13th of 46 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
47 places, 478 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf