Antigua and Barbuda vs Malta: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Antigua and Barbuda
379.35 kg
in 2023
Malta
383.43 kg
in 2017
Antigua and Barbuda rank
93rd
Malta rank
92nd

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Malta
5001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 383.43 kg against 379.35 kg in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 4.08 kg.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 93rd and Malta ranks 92nd of 125 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 502.02 kg 1,644 kg 1,142 kg Malta
1970s 429.99 kg 909.29 kg 479.3 kg Malta
1980s 353.6 kg 423.26 kg 69.66 kg Malta
1990s 314.31 kg 394.78 kg 80.48 kg Malta
2000s 344.87 kg 394.78 kg 49.92 kg Malta
2010s 371.69 kg 383.87 kg 12.18 kg Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Antigua and Barbuda or Malta?
Malta, at 383.43 kg against 379.35 kg in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2017.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Antigua and Barbuda and Malta?
4.08 kg, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Malta?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Malta rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 93rd and Malta ranks 92nd of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Malta: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/antigua-and-barbuda/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/antigua-and-barbuda/malta/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Malta: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).