Barbados vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Barbados
905.17 kg
in 2023
Zambia
980.47 kg
in 2023
Barbados rank
90th
Zambia rank
88th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Barbados
  • Zambia
02004006008001.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 980.47 kg against 905.17 kg in Barbados, a difference of 75.3 kg.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 88th of 125 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 873.08 kg 436.54 kg 436.54 kg Barbados
1970s 873.08 kg 436.54 kg 436.54 kg Barbados
1980s 873.08 kg 508.53 kg 364.55 kg Barbados
1990s 873.08 kg 737.75 kg 135.33 kg Barbados
2000s 911.28 kg 803.23 kg 108.04 kg Barbados
2010s 928.61 kg 914.07 kg 14.54 kg Barbados
2020s 908.99 kg 968.25 kg 59.26 kg Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Barbados or Zambia?
Zambia, at 980.47 kg against 905.17 kg in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Barbados and Zambia?
75.3 kg, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Zambia rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Barbados ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 88th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/barbados/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/barbados/zambia/">Barbados vs Zambia: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).