Botswana vs Haiti: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Botswana
37,215 kg
in 2023
Haiti
63,833 kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
36th
Haiti rank
33rd

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Botswana
  • Haiti
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 63,833 kg against 37,215 kg in Botswana, a difference of 26,618 kg.

That makes Haiti's figure about 1.7 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.

Botswana ranks 36th and Haiti ranks 33rd of 125 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Haiti in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Haiti Difference Ahead
1960s 13,143 kg 46,893 kg 33,751 kg Haiti
1970s 40,608 kg 58,496 kg 17,888 kg Haiti
1980s 62,964 kg 64,477 kg 1,513 kg Haiti
1990s 116,709 kg 63,615 kg 53,094 kg Botswana
2000s 145,445 kg 63,811 kg 81,633 kg Botswana
2010s 99,846 kg 62,760 kg 37,086 kg Botswana
2020s 40,476 kg 63,274 kg 22,798 kg Haiti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Botswana or Haiti?
Haiti, at 63,833 kg against 37,215 kg in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Botswana and Haiti?
26,618 kg, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Haiti?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Haiti rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Botswana ranks 36th and Haiti ranks 33rd of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Haiti: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/botswana/haiti/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/botswana/haiti/">Botswana vs Haiti: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).