Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils

Brazil
424,119 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
292,367 kg
in 2023
Brazil rank
17th
Zimbabwe rank
20th

Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils over time

  • Brazil
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 424,119 kg against 292,367 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 131,752 kg.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 125 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 617,146 kg 34,559 kg 582,587 kg Brazil
1970s 677,680 kg 39,900 kg 637,780 kg Brazil
1980s 692,302 kg 43,174 kg 649,128 kg Brazil
1990s 661,142 kg 51,206 kg 609,936 kg Brazil
2000s 551,139 kg 176,324 kg 374,815 kg Brazil
2010s 467,325 kg 244,713 kg 222,612 kg Brazil
2020s 431,260 kg 270,349 kg 160,911 kg Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses β€” manure applied to soils, Brazil or Zimbabwe?
Brazil, at 424,119 kg against 292,367 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses β€” manure applied to soils between Brazil and Zimbabwe?
131,752 kg, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Zimbabwe rank globally for mules and asses β€” manure applied to soils?
Brazil ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/brazil/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/brazil/zimbabwe/">Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses β€” Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).