Cabo Verde vs Mauritania: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Cabo Verde
8,090 kg
in 2023
Mauritania
150,584 kg
in 2023
Cabo Verde rank
27th
Mauritania rank
25th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Mauritania
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 150,584 kg against 8,090 kg in Cabo Verde, a difference of 142,494 kg.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 18.6 times Cabo Verde's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 27th and Mauritania ranks 25th of 32 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 4,406 kg 70,089 kg 65,683 kg Mauritania
1970s 4,200 kg 73,557 kg 69,357 kg Mauritania
1980s 3,579 kg 63,582 kg 60,003 kg Mauritania
1990s 6,440 kg 76,897 kg 70,456 kg Mauritania
2000s 7,039 kg 110,383 kg 103,344 kg Mauritania
2010s 7,614 kg 135,676 kg 128,063 kg Mauritania
2020s 8,015 kg 147,208 kg 139,193 kg Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Cabo Verde or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 150,584 kg against 8,090 kg in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Cabo Verde and Mauritania?
142,494 kg, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cabo Verde and Mauritania rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Cabo Verde ranks 27th and Mauritania ranks 25th of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs Mauritania: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/cabo-verde-2/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/cabo-verde-2/mauritania/">Cabo Verde vs Mauritania: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).