Cameroon vs Ecuador: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils

Cameroon
17,499 kg
in 2023
Ecuador
19,216 kg
in 2023
Cameroon rank
57th
Ecuador rank
55th

Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Cameroon
  • Ecuador
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 19,216 kg against 17,499 kg in Cameroon, a difference of 1,717 kg.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Cameroon ranks 57th and Ecuador ranks 55th of 133 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 33,468 kg 58,133 kg 24,665 kg Ecuador
1970s 22,108 kg 61,066 kg 38,958 kg Ecuador
1980s 14,798 kg 69,087 kg 54,289 kg Ecuador
1990s 15,846 kg 90,659 kg 74,812 kg Ecuador
2000s 17,200 kg 66,227 kg 49,028 kg Ecuador
2010s 17,488 kg 40,039 kg 22,552 kg Ecuador
2020s 17,503 kg 21,726 kg 4,222 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mules and asses — manure applied to soils, Cameroon or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 19,216 kg against 17,499 kg in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in mules and asses — manure applied to soils between Cameroon and Ecuador?
1,717 kg, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Ecuador rank globally for mules and asses — manure applied to soils?
Cameroon ranks 57th and Ecuador ranks 55th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Ecuador: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/cameroon/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mules-and-asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/cameroon/ecuador/">Cameroon vs Ecuador: Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mules and Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
170 places, 9,721 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).